As I've written about in a number of my previous posts, I have a love/hate relationship with the Internet. On one hand, it can be a glorious treasure trove of knowledge, but on the other hand it can be a mind-numbing time suck. During my late teenage years I could spend every waking minute on the web without incurring any sort of boredom. But as I have aged I've grown considerably more picky about how and where I spend my time online. I wouldn't call myself an information connoisseur, but recently I've found myself getting bored with a lot of the miscellaneous crap that floats about on the Internet.
Instead of contributing to the problem, though, I thought I'd try to contribute to a solution. I wanted to start sharing more links on my blog of random Internet shit that I think is actually worth your time. Now not everybody's going to be interested in every link I post, so feel free to browse them at your leisure. Depending on how this post turns out and how you, dear reader, respond to it, I might make these types of posts a regular part of my blog. So please leave me feedback.
So without further ado, stuff on the Internet that I have recently enjoyed, along with my own personal commentary on each item:
The Conversations: Wong Kar Wai - I recently used this article as a source for a final paper for school, but don't let that turn you off. Jason Bellamy and Ed Howard's comprehensive discussion of five films (Days of Being Wild, Chungking Express, In the Mood for Love, 2046, and My Blueberry Nights) from director Wong Kar-wai is an entertaining and engaging read. While the article is intelligent and critical, the back and forth dynamic of the conversation keeps it from drifting into dry or boring territory. Yes, the article is lengthy, but that's part of the charm for me. In a world of "tl;dr", it's nice to read something online that's got a bit of heft to it. In regards to the article I was particularly amused by their descriptions of the (over)acting within My Blueberry Nights, "...no one is working harder than [Rachel] Wiesz, who by the time she runs out of ways of portray drunken rage and despair is only halfway there", and I enjoyed their debate over the merits of Chungking Express. Overall this article makes for an entertaining and accessible companion piece to the films it discusses.
Madonna's 5 Best Moments on the Big Screen - As it says, this is a quick and timely rundown of the greatest moments in Madonna's acting career. Yes I am well aware that many will find the last sentence to be an impossible contradiction. Still I am of the opinion that Madonna's film career tends to be a bit unfairly criticized simply because people see her as an easy target (I have had this conversation on more than one occasion with my good friend El Lobo!) I also love how this article craftily builds upon and capitalizes off the hype for W.E. That said my only problem with the article is this, where's Evita?
Crestwood House Monster Books - I ran into this article a few months back and loved it, but I couldn't quite find a good place to mention it on my blog so I'm sticking it here. This is a fantastic rundown of a popular children's book series by author Ian Thorne (real name Julian May). Each title in the Crestwood monster series was dedicated to the films of a different monster. Personally I have a nostalgic fondness for this series as its where I was first introduced to Godzilla. While the series was published in the 1970's and '80's, my elementary school library was terribly antiquated so I grew up reading this series even if it was technically before my time. Reading this article and gazing at the accompanying photos brought back so many fantastic memories for me that I just had to link to this one.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Monday, December 12, 2011
Book Review: Film Music
Somewhere between Thanksgiving break and the always hellish and homework saturated final weeks of fall semester, I was able to squeeze in a reading of this slim 160 page text. Film Music: A Very Short Introduction is, exactly as the title says, a short guide to and history of the use of music in movies. The title is part of a massive series of books put out by the Oxford University Press. The Very Short Intro series covers a whole range of topics from the massively broad (history, drugs, the meaning of life, etc.) to the slightly more defined (Aztecs, Kabbalah, The Tudors, etc.). Prior to picking up this title I had some slight knowledge of the series, as I had read Postmodernism: A Very Short Introduction for a class. Truthfully I found Postmodernism to be pretty dry, but I took a gamble and picked this title up because the subject sounded interesting to me.
Like Madonna, I find movie soundtracks compelling. I am interested in how image and sound intersect to create meaning and feeling. I love those moments when the image and music work together to create the "perfect storm" of glorious emotional manipulation. But while I am interested in how music works in narrative film, I had read very little on the subject before I picked up this title.
Kathryn Kalinak's Film Music is primarily comprised of theory regarding how and why music works in conjunction with film and a history of how music has been used in film. My favorite part of Kalinak's text was actually the theoretical stuff. As a movie fan I love to hear people muse about the effects of film, even if such theorizing is abstract in nature. I know this sort of musing is an acquired taste, and some people straight up just don't like it, but those who are interested in film analysis should find Film Music's first few chapters to be full of compelling ideas to mull over. I also appreciated that Kalinak steered clear of hardcore academic speak in her chapters on theory. While her writing carries an air of formality she keeps pretensions at a minimum and is upfront about the limits and sometimes contradictory nature of film theory. I also thoroughly enjoyed her analysis of the infamous use of "Stuck in the Middle With You" during the torture scene in Reservoir Dogs. It almost makes me wish she'd included more specific case studies of music in film, though I realize this would have invalidated the "very short" part of the title.
I wasn't as enthusiastic about the history side of the book, though I did think it was solid enough. Kalinak covers the history of film sound from its inception as live accompaniment to silent film all the way up to Slumdog Millionaire composer A.R. Rahman's 2009 dual Oscar wins. I appreciate the large swath of time Kalinak covers, as well as the global range of history that the book covers. My only problems with the historical aspects of the book were that the text in this section tended to be a bit dry and, again, I was left wanting to know more. Perhaps this latter criticism isn't valid, as this book is intended to be solely a simple introduction. Still I couldn't help but be a tad frustrated at the book's brevity.
Overall though, I think there's plenty to recommend in this text. Film studies students or those with an interest in the field are the ones who are most likely to enjoy this title, but the writing is accessible enough that casual readers should be able to walk away with something as well.
Like Madonna, I find movie soundtracks compelling. I am interested in how image and sound intersect to create meaning and feeling. I love those moments when the image and music work together to create the "perfect storm" of glorious emotional manipulation. But while I am interested in how music works in narrative film, I had read very little on the subject before I picked up this title.
Kathryn Kalinak's Film Music is primarily comprised of theory regarding how and why music works in conjunction with film and a history of how music has been used in film. My favorite part of Kalinak's text was actually the theoretical stuff. As a movie fan I love to hear people muse about the effects of film, even if such theorizing is abstract in nature. I know this sort of musing is an acquired taste, and some people straight up just don't like it, but those who are interested in film analysis should find Film Music's first few chapters to be full of compelling ideas to mull over. I also appreciated that Kalinak steered clear of hardcore academic speak in her chapters on theory. While her writing carries an air of formality she keeps pretensions at a minimum and is upfront about the limits and sometimes contradictory nature of film theory. I also thoroughly enjoyed her analysis of the infamous use of "Stuck in the Middle With You" during the torture scene in Reservoir Dogs. It almost makes me wish she'd included more specific case studies of music in film, though I realize this would have invalidated the "very short" part of the title.
I wasn't as enthusiastic about the history side of the book, though I did think it was solid enough. Kalinak covers the history of film sound from its inception as live accompaniment to silent film all the way up to Slumdog Millionaire composer A.R. Rahman's 2009 dual Oscar wins. I appreciate the large swath of time Kalinak covers, as well as the global range of history that the book covers. My only problems with the historical aspects of the book were that the text in this section tended to be a bit dry and, again, I was left wanting to know more. Perhaps this latter criticism isn't valid, as this book is intended to be solely a simple introduction. Still I couldn't help but be a tad frustrated at the book's brevity.
Overall though, I think there's plenty to recommend in this text. Film studies students or those with an interest in the field are the ones who are most likely to enjoy this title, but the writing is accessible enough that casual readers should be able to walk away with something as well.
Friday, December 2, 2011
Why I Dread the New Lorax
Now look, I'm not normally the type to bitch about remakes, redos, and reboots. I find such behavior to be generally dull and pointless. I mean we live in a capitalist society, it's obvious and completely understandable that people are going to want to capitalize on established brand names rather than take a risk on new properties. That being said, the new Lorax movie kind of pisses me off.
Like most nerds with misdirected anger my annoyance stems from an intense personal identification with an aged piece of pop culture. I was first gripped by the story of the Lorax through the 1972 animated TV special which used the original Dr. Seuss text to tell a story through dialogue, song, narration, and hand-drawn animation. What has always intrigued me about The Lorax is the darkness of the story in comparison with other children's fare. The audience is left with hope at the end of the tale, but there is no guarantee that everything will be okay. It is encouraging to see a children's property that has enough faith in the intelligence of its audience not to hold their hands all the way through the end.
Another reason that I love the original Lorax story is the universality of its characters and themes. On the surface The Lorax is a cautionary tale that urges the viewer to care for the environment, but the story isn't some mere public service announcement. On a broader level the film also speaks about fatal human weaknesses such as greed and arrogance. While the character of the Once-ler causes tragic environmental destruction on a massive scale, he is a sympathetic individual. One of my favorite moments in the original cartoon occurs when the Once-ler experiences moments of self-doubt while sitting alone amongst his riches. The guilt and denial that the character expresses in this scene illustrate the impressive complexity of the character, as well as his universality (after all, we are all flawed individuals). The Once-ler is not a super villain who gets joy from destruction, but rather a well-intentioned but fatally flawed guy. I also love how we never get to see the Once-ler's face. The Once-ler's anonymity allows the viewer to project themselves onto the character. Giving the Once-ler a face and identity (as the new Lorax film does) allows the viewer to disassociate with the character. I wouldn't be surprised if this left the viewer with a less emotionally powerful experience as a result.
Another giant problem I have with the new Lorax film is that they seem to have molded the original's touching story of greed run amok into a trite "boy meets girl" tale. According to Wikipedia, "The film follows Ted, an idealistic young boy, who tries to find the one thing that will win him affection of Audrey the girl of his dreams. To do so, he must discover the story of the Lorax, the grumpy yet charming creature who fights to protect his world". Really? If this synopsis proves accurate it will mean that the moral themes of the original film have devolved into a story of some guy trying to get into some girl's pants through a feigned interest in environmental issues. I weep for the future.
Another reason that I love the original Lorax story is the universality of its characters and themes. On the surface The Lorax is a cautionary tale that urges the viewer to care for the environment, but the story isn't some mere public service announcement. On a broader level the film also speaks about fatal human weaknesses such as greed and arrogance. While the character of the Once-ler causes tragic environmental destruction on a massive scale, he is a sympathetic individual. One of my favorite moments in the original cartoon occurs when the Once-ler experiences moments of self-doubt while sitting alone amongst his riches. The guilt and denial that the character expresses in this scene illustrate the impressive complexity of the character, as well as his universality (after all, we are all flawed individuals). The Once-ler is not a super villain who gets joy from destruction, but rather a well-intentioned but fatally flawed guy. I also love how we never get to see the Once-ler's face. The Once-ler's anonymity allows the viewer to project themselves onto the character. Giving the Once-ler a face and identity (as the new Lorax film does) allows the viewer to disassociate with the character. I wouldn't be surprised if this left the viewer with a less emotionally powerful experience as a result.
Another giant problem I have with the new Lorax film is that they seem to have molded the original's touching story of greed run amok into a trite "boy meets girl" tale. According to Wikipedia, "The film follows Ted, an idealistic young boy, who tries to find the one thing that will win him affection of Audrey the girl of his dreams. To do so, he must discover the story of the Lorax, the grumpy yet charming creature who fights to protect his world". Really? If this synopsis proves accurate it will mean that the moral themes of the original film have devolved into a story of some guy trying to get into some girl's pants through a feigned interest in environmental issues. I weep for the future.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Junji Ito's Gyo

Gyo tells the tale of Tadashi, a rather ordinary guy who discovers a monster fish whilst vacationing with his girlfriend Kaori. This fish is attached to a bizarre metal contraption with "legs" that allow it to walk on land and, unfortunately for our heroes, is only one of many sea creatures of its ilk. Soon all sorts of sea creatures, including a shark and a whale, are rising out of the water on mechanical legs and coming ashore to wreck havoc on human civilization. The image of the whale is visually stunning - its body is so massive that its legs bend and collapse under its weight. The origin of the creatures is unknown. What is known is that they carry with them disease and an overpowering stench, a smell which one character compares to that of a human corpse on a hot summer day. After awhile humans catch the disease and become infected. Eventually the bodies of the infected humans attach themselves to the same contraptions that allowed the fish to walk on land (see the picture for a particularly awesome and grotesque example) and humanity is pretty much screwed.
Gyo, like Uzumaki, excels at darkly imaginative and witty imagery. The bloated and diseased human corpses riding on mechanical legs form a great visual juxtaposition between organic fragility and cold mechanized efficiency, while also spectacularly capitalizing on humanity's innate fear of disease and decay. Fish walking on land is another great horror image because it violates the divide between land and sea in ways that are both grotesque and fascinating. In other words, Gyo thrives on contradictions and juxtapositions, like fish that live on land and dead bodies that move. Along this same line one of my favorite moments in the manga occurs when the hero comes upon a circus in which diseased animals and people perform for a non-existent audience. A circus held during the end of the world...what an awesome concept!
But lest I sound like a drooling fangirl, let me point out that I still think this work is inferior to Ito's Uzumaki. The narrative here is less developed and less strong than that in Uzumaki and the characters are pretty underdeveloped. In particular, Tadashi's mad scientist uncle came across as silly and B-movie-ish (and not in a good way).
That said, Gyo's still a solid work, and I highly recommend it to fans of Uzumaki or the horror genre in general. The complete story stretches two volumes and is available in English courtesy of Viz Media. Volume two contains two bonus short stories by Ito, which are unrelated to the plot of Gyo, but nonetheless make for decent capstones to this wonderfully weird work.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Stuff I Wanna See: Moonlight Mask
I was doing some browsing on Facebook when I saw the poster to your left. I was intrigued by the retro-coolness of the poster design as well as the inexplicable yet awesome outfits on display (the turban and sunglasses combo, the tidy 1950's hat and suit, the dude with the skull mask in the left hand corner, etc.) I love offbeat Japanese movies and this was one that I knew nothing about.
So I did a bit of exploring using the vast resources of the Internet and discovered that the poster in question was an advertisement for a film in the "Moonlight Mask" series. Moonlight Mask, apparently, was a Japanese superhero from the late 1950's. Wikipedia (which, granted, isn't the best source in the world, but my resources were limited here) describes Moonlight Mask's appearance as follows, "Decked out in white tights, white & red cape, white scarf, yellow gloves & boots, dark glasses, face cloth and Indian-style turban (pinned with a 'moon' ornament), Moonlight Mask is armed with a whip, two six-shooters, shuriken and moon-shaped boomerangs. He also rides a motorcycle." Moonlight Mask made his debut on television in 1958. A film trilogy was released in the same year, presumably to capitalize on the popularity of the property. The poster I've included in my post is for the second film in the series, Moonlight Mask - Duel to the Death in Dangerous Waters. The series was apparently revived a handful of times, by way of a 1970's anime series and a 1981 film. There also exists a parody of the franchise titled "Kekko Kamen", which follows a topless and pants-less masked superheroine who incapacitates her enemies by shoving her crotch into their faces (?!?!).
Anyhow, I'm getting off topic. The reason I posted this is because the old-school 1958 Midnight Mask stuff looks awesome (in a kitschy, campy way) and I'd love to watch it/learn more about it. Unfortunately, though, I'm having trouble finding info about the series in English. Are there any fanboys or girls who know where I could get my hands on a subtitled copy of the original 1950's TV episodes or movies? This looks like a piece of pop history that's too compelling to let slip by.
So I did a bit of exploring using the vast resources of the Internet and discovered that the poster in question was an advertisement for a film in the "Moonlight Mask" series. Moonlight Mask, apparently, was a Japanese superhero from the late 1950's. Wikipedia (which, granted, isn't the best source in the world, but my resources were limited here) describes Moonlight Mask's appearance as follows, "Decked out in white tights, white & red cape, white scarf, yellow gloves & boots, dark glasses, face cloth and Indian-style turban (pinned with a 'moon' ornament), Moonlight Mask is armed with a whip, two six-shooters, shuriken and moon-shaped boomerangs. He also rides a motorcycle." Moonlight Mask made his debut on television in 1958. A film trilogy was released in the same year, presumably to capitalize on the popularity of the property. The poster I've included in my post is for the second film in the series, Moonlight Mask - Duel to the Death in Dangerous Waters. The series was apparently revived a handful of times, by way of a 1970's anime series and a 1981 film. There also exists a parody of the franchise titled "Kekko Kamen", which follows a topless and pants-less masked superheroine who incapacitates her enemies by shoving her crotch into their faces (?!?!).
Anyhow, I'm getting off topic. The reason I posted this is because the old-school 1958 Midnight Mask stuff looks awesome (in a kitschy, campy way) and I'd love to watch it/learn more about it. Unfortunately, though, I'm having trouble finding info about the series in English. Are there any fanboys or girls who know where I could get my hands on a subtitled copy of the original 1950's TV episodes or movies? This looks like a piece of pop history that's too compelling to let slip by.
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Best Music Writing 2010: The Highlights

I just finished reading the last entry the other day. Overall, I enjoyed this title. The book is composed of thirty-six different articles, each somehow related to music, that was published in 2009 (the "2010" of the title refers to the date the compilation itself was published). The articles vary greatly in both content and form. There's an impressive range of music genres and personalities covered, and the writing styles on display include interviews, profiles, personal essays, and investigative pieces. I enjoyed the variety in this volume as it exposed me to stuff I would never normally read about, and thus slightly broadened my worldview in the process (always a good thing). Anyway, for those who enjoy reading entertainment journalism, this is a solid read that, on the whole, is well edited and assembled. Only one article, the needlessly pretentious "Lady Gaga in Hell" (which bizarrely compares the "Poker Face" video to poet William Blake's description of Hell), came across as a complete dud. All the other articles were amusing or interesting or both.
Now with that said, I'd like to switch up my normal book reviewing routine. Since this is a compilation of a number of different writings, I'd like to take this space to highlight the articles I found particularly interesting or worth-reading. I've picked three (a nice, arbitrary number) articles that particularly clicked with me, though of course I urge any interested parties to pick up the book and decide for themselves what's hot and what's not. With that disclaimer out of the way let's begin the countdown:
2) "Michael Jackson: An Appreciation of His Talent" - Jason King. This is the second of two articles in this compilation that were written in response to Michael Jackson's death in the summer of 2009. And of the two articles, this one's my favorite. King's article is useful both as a quick overview of Jackson's career and as an analysis of his public persona. The historical overview of Jackson's career as presented here is thorough yet incredibly readable. I loved the comparison King draws between Thriller and the blockbusters of the 1970s, "...1982's Thriller defined the pop album as a blockbuster mega-spectacle. It did for music what Jaws and Star Wars did for film, turning an art form into an event". Also interesting is King's analysis of Jackson's public persona, which manages to be sympathetic while still packing a critical punch.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011
My Favorite Things
THESE ARE MY FAVORITE THINGSSS!!
*Audience of middle-aged women screams at the top of their lungs*
And so it goes. Well, I know I'm no Oprah, but that doesn't mean I can't rip her show off all the same. In the spirit of the departed Oprah show (and in the spirit of materialism and happy holidays) I thought it would be fun to blog about my favorite stuff. Now, as I said earlier I'm no media mogul, so there's no free shit here. If you're looking for complimentary cars, I can tell you that I have none. But what I do have are a very particular set of geeky interests, which make for entertaining (if not self-indulgent and fan-ish) blog fodder.
Okay, before I continue let's lay down some ground rules. First thing, being that this is a petite blog post there's no way I'm gonna fit everything I currently like on this thing. I'm not even going to try to make this a comprehensive list, so no tears if you notice that I missed something awesome/cool. Life's not fair. So with the limited scope of the list in mind, let me give you some further idea of how I've organized this list. I've picked two categories: movies and books. In each of the two categories I've picked three different things that I happen to like. Now, these three things are random- they may be something current or an old favorite or just something in between. Rest assured, if I mention something here then I think that it's pretty cool and it is given the Hedorah stamp of approval.
Now without further ado, let's get the party started. These are a few of my favorite things:
Movies:
In Bruges - I have loved this movie since I first viewed it in a Chicago theater with my friend El Lobo back in 2008. Recently I decided to revisit it after combing through my DVD collection during a fit of boredom. And you know what? It's still awesome. Beautiful European scenery, unflinching violence, and an awesome cast of oddball characters are all selling points, but it's the darkly witty dialogue that really makes the movie for me (ex- "A lot of midgets tend to kill themselves. A disproportionate amount, actually...not the R2-D2 man; no, he's still going"). Not to sound like a snob, but a lot of modern mainstream comedy leaves me cold. In Bruges was just dark, biting, and smart enough to break past my pretensions and make me laugh. And the fact that the movie still entertains on the fourth or fifth time 'round is a testament to how well-written this film is.
Outrage - Outrage is a Japanese yakuza flick from 2010. I recently had the chance to see it in the theater and I thought it was a pretty solid picture. Outrage tells the blood-soaked story of power struggles amongst members of modern Japan's criminal underbelly. It's a pure adrenaline rush of a movie as betrayals and power grabs among the yakuza lead to inventive and increasingly brutal moments of violence (the film's unconventional use of dental equipment is unforgettable). Couple these punchy moments of violence with some sharp black humor and you have a movie worth the price of admission.
Curse of the Golden Flower - I saw this movie in theaters way back when it first came out in '07, but I decided to revisit it recently after watching Red Sorghum (the 1987 film that marked the directorial debut of Zhang Yimou as well as the acting debut of Gong Li) earlier this year. Despite some dated CG, I found that Golden Flower still thrills. The movie's story is Shakespearean in scope and it's fun to watch the characters' tortured relationships play out as their dark family secrets come to light. Plus, the elaborate costumes are spectacular and Gong Li is awesome as the Empress who tries in vain to defy her husband's rule. The action scenes here are pretty rock solid as well.
Books:
Retromania by Simon Reynolds - Reynolds is a music critic/commentator who noticed a trend of recycling and repackaging in modern pop music and decided to investigate. Reynolds spends 400+ pages mining the culture behind the recycling of old musical material and theorizing on why the nostalgia market for old musical acts/styles has grown so bloated in recent years. The author is prone to go off on tangents, but for those with an interest in pop culture these tangents will be just another enjoyable part of the ride that is Retromania. While Reynolds is specifically interested in music, his book will appeal to anyone interested in pop culture creation and consumption in a broad sense. I found his chapter on Youtube to be particularly awesome.
The Sandman Vol. 1: Preludes and Nocturnes by Neil Gaiman - I loved the Sandman series in high school and recently went back and read the first few volumes. Guess what? They're still compelling pieces of storytelling. The Sandman series is so hyped that I feel like any praise I have to give is redundant at this point, so I'll just leave it at this: the series is awesome and you should read it if you have not yet done so.
Witchcraft Through the Ages by Jack Stevenson - a quick read that sheds light on an interesting though relatively obscure figure in film history - Benjamin Christensen, the director of the cult 1920's film Haxan. While much of the book focuses on Haxan, it also details Christensen's life and career before and after the making of his most famous film. Lovers of the obscure or the offbeat will delight in this slim, yet informative title. It also makes a great companion piece to a viewing of Haxan.
*Audience of middle-aged women screams at the top of their lungs*
And so it goes. Well, I know I'm no Oprah, but that doesn't mean I can't rip her show off all the same. In the spirit of the departed Oprah show (and in the spirit of materialism and happy holidays) I thought it would be fun to blog about my favorite stuff. Now, as I said earlier I'm no media mogul, so there's no free shit here. If you're looking for complimentary cars, I can tell you that I have none. But what I do have are a very particular set of geeky interests, which make for entertaining (if not self-indulgent and fan-ish) blog fodder.
Okay, before I continue let's lay down some ground rules. First thing, being that this is a petite blog post there's no way I'm gonna fit everything I currently like on this thing. I'm not even going to try to make this a comprehensive list, so no tears if you notice that I missed something awesome/cool. Life's not fair. So with the limited scope of the list in mind, let me give you some further idea of how I've organized this list. I've picked two categories: movies and books. In each of the two categories I've picked three different things that I happen to like. Now, these three things are random- they may be something current or an old favorite or just something in between. Rest assured, if I mention something here then I think that it's pretty cool and it is given the Hedorah stamp of approval.
Now without further ado, let's get the party started. These are a few of my favorite things:
Movies:
In Bruges - I have loved this movie since I first viewed it in a Chicago theater with my friend El Lobo back in 2008. Recently I decided to revisit it after combing through my DVD collection during a fit of boredom. And you know what? It's still awesome. Beautiful European scenery, unflinching violence, and an awesome cast of oddball characters are all selling points, but it's the darkly witty dialogue that really makes the movie for me (ex- "A lot of midgets tend to kill themselves. A disproportionate amount, actually...not the R2-D2 man; no, he's still going"). Not to sound like a snob, but a lot of modern mainstream comedy leaves me cold. In Bruges was just dark, biting, and smart enough to break past my pretensions and make me laugh. And the fact that the movie still entertains on the fourth or fifth time 'round is a testament to how well-written this film is.
Outrage - Outrage is a Japanese yakuza flick from 2010. I recently had the chance to see it in the theater and I thought it was a pretty solid picture. Outrage tells the blood-soaked story of power struggles amongst members of modern Japan's criminal underbelly. It's a pure adrenaline rush of a movie as betrayals and power grabs among the yakuza lead to inventive and increasingly brutal moments of violence (the film's unconventional use of dental equipment is unforgettable). Couple these punchy moments of violence with some sharp black humor and you have a movie worth the price of admission.
Curse of the Golden Flower - I saw this movie in theaters way back when it first came out in '07, but I decided to revisit it recently after watching Red Sorghum (the 1987 film that marked the directorial debut of Zhang Yimou as well as the acting debut of Gong Li) earlier this year. Despite some dated CG, I found that Golden Flower still thrills. The movie's story is Shakespearean in scope and it's fun to watch the characters' tortured relationships play out as their dark family secrets come to light. Plus, the elaborate costumes are spectacular and Gong Li is awesome as the Empress who tries in vain to defy her husband's rule. The action scenes here are pretty rock solid as well.
Books:
Retromania by Simon Reynolds - Reynolds is a music critic/commentator who noticed a trend of recycling and repackaging in modern pop music and decided to investigate. Reynolds spends 400+ pages mining the culture behind the recycling of old musical material and theorizing on why the nostalgia market for old musical acts/styles has grown so bloated in recent years. The author is prone to go off on tangents, but for those with an interest in pop culture these tangents will be just another enjoyable part of the ride that is Retromania. While Reynolds is specifically interested in music, his book will appeal to anyone interested in pop culture creation and consumption in a broad sense. I found his chapter on Youtube to be particularly awesome.
The Sandman Vol. 1: Preludes and Nocturnes by Neil Gaiman - I loved the Sandman series in high school and recently went back and read the first few volumes. Guess what? They're still compelling pieces of storytelling. The Sandman series is so hyped that I feel like any praise I have to give is redundant at this point, so I'll just leave it at this: the series is awesome and you should read it if you have not yet done so.
Witchcraft Through the Ages by Jack Stevenson - a quick read that sheds light on an interesting though relatively obscure figure in film history - Benjamin Christensen, the director of the cult 1920's film Haxan. While much of the book focuses on Haxan, it also details Christensen's life and career before and after the making of his most famous film. Lovers of the obscure or the offbeat will delight in this slim, yet informative title. It also makes a great companion piece to a viewing of Haxan.
![]() |
Benjamin Christensen himself as Satan in Haxan! |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)